Page 67 - Skd 201-2544-11

G[,lOtechnologyrelerslo the scienceol geneticallymodityingour food sources,makingour plantsmore

. - r i T n n t t op e 5 t sr n d p e s t rcr l e sd rr l ! p r g g e n e s c o n t a n n g v l a m n s n o t n a t u r a y e x s t n g i n p a r t c ! a r

loods. The rcsultanftoorlscomprlslntghesegeneLcay nrodfled nllredienlsth. ereforeh.avccatcrcdto

oLrrndvidua needsfor betterqlaliy fourshrenL. On a :rrgerscae, lhe argLrmefnotrthegenetc ene

neerng .rf food s basedon then,a,ofdor af n. .r< ng foodsLrppj to feedtl e lteaLll/ increasng word

p o p L r a t o fB. e c a u steh ea f e ao l a n d a v aa b p f o f o n . tl o d L r c t o f l s f f l t e , a d \ . n c e s 5 u . h r s G l , 4 O t e c h n o
lollyreproscnstgnfcantbreaktlirouglnrsLhequa Iyandquantlyof foodpro.ltrction.

BLrtthc argumentot rthegenecL engineenrgol loodatt rnespaes n comparLsotonTh€malo ron

cernsrecentyfased allansi GMOs. Forexampe lhereareLrfkno,,lennvTonTnentmapicalons Gl\4O

technoogyLrsecnl llfownqcropsmayhavefegatlveeffectson the bodiverstyol wldile as a resultol
changesn bothava ableandLrseaebJoodsources.Thcnthcres themoraissle slrroLrfL|nag Lechno

ollythaimodfesa LVirgorgarismh:rvfg hadlrralspecJcgenetlccompostonforthepastr b on ye.rs.

WhaLaboutthe appropratcnessof usfg palefl aw ln sLrchan aTeaso c osey nkedto processeswir cir

arelundamentlao ie;that s,food?A so,howcaf a cornpancy e m to haveinvenleda lvng thn!l? What

a b o utth ew el a r eo l t h o s en d e v e o p l n l l c o ! n t r e s w h onwoj t b e a b e l o a f l o r d t h e L e c h n o o g y ?

Certalny, evenbeioreentern!l oneof lhcsoand mafy moredebatesassocaledw LhGl\4Otechno

logy.wc haveto ask oLrrseves I vreevenrealy knowfor slre thatthc prorllcts are safeior consumptof.

l\/lan,y:lfugproduclscomprlsng genect aly englfeeredfgredefts mayeffecvt ey f !lht d s€asey, el lher
ong lermelfectsafe si lnknown. The ftamols Tha dornlaledrug mnredatey comesto m rrd effectlve

ln combatng morningsckfess n pregnani\lomen

lle n

thedeveopmcnot f bofesinfetlsesw, hch wasnotdis

oovereduntl I !!astoo ate

Yet,desple lhe negaive coveralleG[./]Oshave

d" o "". 6 .dpop dr' d o

be denled Gl!4OprodLrctsstl iood word markeLs.

A lhoughtheFoodand Drlg Admn strationoJTharand

s n Lre pTocessof enforcnll G[4O productabe ng

by the end oi ths year,youraveTargceonsurneaTs of

4^P:!--"r->L-- y.)- todayis sr I Lrnawartehat G[4O rgredefts are Tound
in such prodlcts as lofu. soyb€ano , cannedtuna f sir

andketchLrspo, d onsupermarksehl evesthroughoLtrrrleco!ntry. On thc oih€r end of the spectrum,

thereerean ncfeasngnrrnbcrof counlfesthatwl notd sLribuLOe[4OprodLrctfsor sae ]f theyarc not

properyabeed. Counlflesn EuropeJ.apanafd Mlslm couftfleshavegoneso1afas to banthelmporot l
joodproductscontafifg GMO ngredlents At theendof th. day,theprosafd consof Gf,/lotechroogy

andfoodsarestconstantbyeifgdebatedL. etushopethato! r conciLorsns arc notcontestebdytheaotua

oLrlcomaendadversccffecstsomedecallesdowntlre ne.. Story:vanchaTi an/ Pholos:Photograpshtyall

Way Towards the Future ?